Tools   Select Another Resource Report Type

http://cra.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/delirium_training_package/ManagementOfConfusionFinalMarch09/module02/amt-form.pdf

A 10 question assessment to assess elderly patients for the possibility of dementia. The test has utility across a range of acute and outpatient settings. It takes five minutes to administer and must include all 10 questions. A score of less than 7 or 8 suggests cognitive impairment. Scoring: * 7-10 (correct) No Cognitive Impairment * 6-0 (correct) Cognitive Impairment, THIS RESOURCE IS NO LONGER IN SERVICE. Documented on September 16,2025.

Proper citation: Abbreviated Mental Test Score (RRID:SCR_003677) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/yale-brown-obsessive-compulsive-scale/

Self-rating scale to assess the severity and type of symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Each question is to be answered based on the average occurrence of each item over the past week. The first 5 questions relate to obsessive thoughts, the last 5 questions relate to compulsive behaviors. Scoring: * 07 Sub-Clinical * 815 Mild * 1623 Moderate * 2431 Severe * 3240 Extreme

Proper citation: Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (RRID:SCR_003676) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/cage-alcohol-questionaire/

4-item questionnaire, where the name is an acronym of its four questions, that can indicate potential problems with alcohol abuse and has been extensively validated for use in identifying alcoholism. It has been determined that CAGE test scores >=2 had a specificity of 76% and a sensitivity of 93% for the identification of excessive drinking and a specificity of 77% and a sensitivity of 91% for the identification of alcoholism. The most important question in the questionnaire is the use of a drink as an Eye Opener, so much so that some clinicians use a yes to this question alone as a positive to the questionnaire; this is due to the fact that the use of an alcoholic drink as an Eye Opener denotes abuse since the patient is going through withdrawal in the morning, hence the need for a drink as an Eye Opener.(Adapted from Wikipedia) Scoring: * 2 (or more) yes responses indicates the possibility of alcoholism

Proper citation: CAGE Questionnaire (RRID:SCR_003702) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/young-mania-rating-scale

An eleven-item, multiple-choice diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of manic episodes in patients. The scale was originally developed for use in the evaluation of adult patients who were suffering from bipolar disorder, but has since been modified for use in pediatric patients. A similar scale was then developed to allow clinicians to interview parents about their children's symptoms, in order to ascertain a better diagnosis of mania in children. Clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the parent version of the scale. The scale provided is in a slightly reworded form as a self-assessment. This may not be as accurate when self-administered, as people suffering from mania are often unable to properly assess relevant outward symptoms.

Proper citation: Young Mania Rating Scale (RRID:SCR_003700) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/gad-7/

A seven item assessment to measure the severity of a patient's anxiety. The test is self administered and cannot be used to replace a proper clinical assessment and additional evaluations.

Proper citation: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (RRID:SCR_003666) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

https://pdbp.ninds.nih.gov/assets/crfs/Hamilton%20Anxiety%20Rating%20Scale%20(HAM-A).pdf

Assessment scale to assess the severity of symptoms of anxiety in adults, adolescents and children. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Although the HAM-A remains widely used as an outcome measure in clinical trials, it has been criticized for its sometimes poor ability to discriminate between anxiolytic and antidepressant effects, and somatic anxiety versus somatic side effects. The HAM-A does not provide any standardized probe questions. Despite this, the reported levels of inter-rater reliability for the scale appear to be acceptable. The scale has been translated into: Cantonese for China, French and Spanish. An IVR version of the scale is available from Healthcare Technology Systems.

Proper citation: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (RRID:SCR_003664) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/binge-eating-scale/

A 16 item questionnaire used to assess the presence of binge eating behavior indicative of an eating disorder that was devised specifically for use with obese individuals. The questions are based upon both behavioral characteristics (e.g., amount of food consumed) and the emotional, cognitive response, guilt or shame. Each question has 3-4 separate responses assigned a numerical value. The score range is from 0-46: * < 17 Non-Binging * 18-26 Moderate Binging * 27 and greater Severe Binging (Adapted from Wikipedia)

Proper citation: Binge Eating Scale (RRID:SCR_003694) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.1000livesplus.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/1011/ABOS.pdf

A thirty-item diagnostic scale devised to be answered by the parents, spouse or other family member of an individual suspected of having an eating disorder. The questions address three factors; unusual eating behavior, bulimic-type behavior and hyperactivity. The ABOS however does not address the frequency of the observed behavior. The ABOS is scored on a range of from 0-60. There are three possible answers provided per question, each assigned a numerical value: two points for yes, zero for no, and one for don't know. (Adapted from Wikipedia) Scoring: * 0-10 Non-Anorexic * 11-20 Retest Required in 2 Months * 21-30 Anorexic Eating Detected, More Testing Required * 31-60 Severe Anorexia, Seek Professional Guidance

Proper citation: Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale (RRID:SCR_003693) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www4.parinc.com/Products/Product.aspx?ProductID=EDI-3

A self-report questionnaire used to assess the presence of eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorder not otherwise specified including Binge Eating Disorder (BED). The original questionnaire consisted of 64 questions, divided into eight subscales. There have been two subsequent revisions by Garner; Eating disorder inventory-two (EDI-2) and Eating disorder inventory-three (EDI-3). (Adapted from Wikipedia) The EDI-3 consists of 91 items organized into 12 primary scales: Drive for Thinness, Bulimia, Body Dissatisfaction, Low Self-Esteem, Personal Alienation, Interpersonal Insecurity, Interpersonal Alienation, Interoceptive Deficits, Emotional Dysregulation, Perfectionism, Asceticism, and Maturity Fears.

Proper citation: Eating Disorder Inventory (RRID:SCR_003696) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.scid4.org/

A diagnostic exam used to determine DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I) (major mental disorders) and Axis II disorders (SCID-II) (personality disorders). An Axis I SCID assessment with a psychiatric patient usually takes between 1 and 2 hours, depending on the complexity of the subject's psychiatric history and their ability to clearly describe episodes of current and past symptoms. A SCID with a non-psychiatric patient takes 1/2 hour to 1-1/2 hours. A SCID-II personality assessment takes about 1/2 to 1 hour. The instrument was designed to be administered by a clinician or trained mental health professional. (Adapter from Wikipedia)

Proper citation: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (RRID:SCR_003682) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.dementiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/MiniMentalStateExamination.pdf

A 30 question assessment test to screen patients for cognitive impairment that is commonly used in medicine to screen for dementia. It is also used to estimate the severity of cognitive impairment and to follow the course of cognitive changes in an individual over time, thus making it an effective way to document an individual's response to treatment. It takes about 10 minutes and examines functions including arithmetic, memory and orientation.

Proper citation: Mini-Mental State Examination (RRID:SCR_003681) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://psychology-tools.com/major-depression-inventory/

A 12 item self-report mood assessment developed by the World Health Organisation that is able to generate an ICD-10 or DSM-IV diagnosis of clinical depression in addition to an estimate of symptom severity. Scoring: * Mild depression: A score of 4 or 5 in two of the first three items. Plus a score of at least 3 on two or three of the last seven items. * Moderate depression: A score of 4 or 5 in two or three of the first three items. Plus a score of at least 3 on four of the last seven items. * Severe depression: A score of 4 or 5 in all of the first three items. Plus a score of at least 3 on five or more of the last seven items. * Major depression: The number of items is reduced to nine, as Item 4 is part of Item 5. Include whichever of the two items has the highest score (item 4 or 5). A score on at least five items is required, to be scored as follows: the score on the first three items must be at least 4, and on the other items at least 3. Either Item 1 or 2 must have a score of 4 or 5.

Proper citation: Major Depression Inventory (RRID:SCR_003688) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.teenmentalhealth.org/images/resources/CAPN_11Item_KADS.pdf

A psychological self-rating scale developed by Dalhousie University professor of psychiatry Stan Kutcher, to assess the level of depression in adolescents. While there are some variations, the 11-item version of the KADS is the most commonly used and most thoroughly verified for efficacy in monitoring outcomes in adolescents who are receiving treatment for major depressive disorder. Its items are worded using standard and colloquial terminology, and responses are scored on a simple 4 choice scale. There are ten questions about depression symptom frequency that the patient rates on a straight 4 point scale according to the following choices: hardly ever, much of the time, most of the time, all the time, and one question relating to the severity of suicidal ideation. Scores on the test range from 0 to 33. Unlike some rating scales, there is no threshold for sub-clinical presentation, or ranges for mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. Higher scores simply indicate more severe current depression symptoms. (Adapted from Wikipedia)

Proper citation: Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (RRID:SCR_003687) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.fresno.ucsf.edu/pediatrics/downloads/edinburghscale.pdf

A 10 item assessment scale developed to identify women who have postpartum depression (PPD). Items of the scale correspond to various clinical depression symptoms, such as guilt feeling, sleep disturbance, low energy, anhedonia, and suicidal ideation. Overall assessment is done by total score, which is determined by adding together the scores for each of the 10 items. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. The EPDS may be used within 8 weeks postpartum and it also can be applied for depression screening during pregnancy. (Adapted from Wikipedia) Scoring: * 0-9 Not Likely to Have Depression * 10-30 Likely to Have Depression

Proper citation: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (RRID:SCR_003685) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.biostat.wustl.edu/~adrc/cdrpgm/

A numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia (i.e. its stage). Using a structured-interview protocol, a qualified health professional assesses a patient's cognitive and functional performance in six areas: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Scores in each of these are combined to obtain a composite score ranging from 0 through 3. (Adapted from Wikipedia)

Proper citation: Clinical Dementia Rating (RRID:SCR_003678) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://www.neuroskills.com/

A topical portal and providers of brain injury rehabilitation services. Resources * Pharmacology Guide * Glossary of Brain Injury Terms * Brain Injury Research Articles * Common Brain Injury Assessment Tools / Rating Scale * Certified Continuing Education Courses * Links to Resource Sites

Proper citation: Centre for Neuro Skills (RRID:SCR_006106) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://gocognitive.net/

Free access to materials for students, educators, and researchers in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Currently there are about a dozen demonstrations and more than 30 videos that were produced over the last two years. The basic philosophy of goCognitive rests on the assumption that easy and free access to high-quality content will improve the learning experience of students and will enable more students to enjoy the field of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. There are a few parts of goCognitive that are only available to registered users who have provided their email address, but all of the online demonstrations and videos are accessible to the everyone. Both new demonstrations and new video interviews will continually be added to the site. Manuals for each of the demonstration are being created and available as pdf files for download. Most of the demonstrations are pretty straightforward - but in some cases, especially if you would like to collect data - it might be a good idea to look over the manual. There are different ways in which you can get involved and contribute to the site. Your involvement can range from sending us feedback about the demonstrations and videos, suggestions for new materials, or the simple submission of corrections, to the creation or publication of demonstrations and videos that meet our criteria. Down the road we will make the submission process easier, but for now please contact swerner (at) uidaho dot edu for more information. NSF student grant Undergraduate students can apply through goCognitive for an $1,100 grant to co-produce a new video interview with a leading researcher in the field of cognitive neuroscience. The funding has been provided by the National Science Foundation.

Proper citation: goCognitive (RRID:SCR_006154) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

https://www.mristudio.org/

An image processing program running under Windows suitable for such tasks as tensor calculation, color mapping, fiber tracking, and 3D visualization. Most of operations can be done with only a few clicks. This tool evolved from DTI Studio. Tools in the program can be grouped in the following way: * Image Viewer * Diffusion Tensor Calculations * Fiber Tracking and Editing * 3D Visualization * Image File Management * Region of Interesting (ROI) Drawing and Statistics * Image Registration

Proper citation: MRI Studio (RRID:SCR_001398) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

http://bmsr.usc.edu/software/pneuma/

A set of modules that are used to simulate the autoregulation of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems under conditions of changing sleep-wake state and a variety of physiological and pharmacological interventions. It models the dynamic interactions that take place among the various component mechanisms, including those involved in the chemical control of breathing, heart rate, and blood pressure, as well as the effects of changes in the sleep-wake state and arousal from sleep. PNEUMA includes the autonomic control of the cardiovascular system, chemoreflex and state-related control of breath-to-breath ventilation, state-related and chemoreflex control of upper airway potency, as well as respiratory and circulatory mechanics. The model is capable of simulating the cardiorespiratory responses to sleep onset, arousal, continuous positive airway pressure, the administration of inhaled carbon dioxide and oxygen, Valsalva and Mueller maneuvers, and Cheyne-Stokes respiration during sleep. In PNEUMA 3.0, we have extended the existing integrative model of respiratory, cardiovascular, and sleepwake state control, to incorporate a sub-model of glucoseinsulinfatty acid regulation. The extended model is capable of simulating the metabolic control of glucoseinsulin dynamics and its interactions with the autonomic nervous system. The interactions between autonomic and metabolic control include the circadian regulation of epinephrine secretion, epinephrine regulation on dynamic fluctuations in glucose and free fatty acids in plasma, metabolic coupling among tissues and organs mediated by insulin and epinephrine, as well as the effect of insulin on peripheral vascular sympathetic activity. This extended model represents a starting point from which further in silico investigations into the interaction between the autonomic nervous system and the metabolic control system can proceed. Features in PNEUMA 3.0 * Incorporates metabolic component based on prior models of glucose-insulin regulation and free fatty acid (FFA) regulation. * Changes in sympathetic activity from the autonomic portion of PNEUMA produce changes in epinephrine output, which in turn affects the metabolic sub-model. * Inputs from the dietary intake of glucose and external interventions, such as insulin injections, have also been incorporated. * Also incorporated is autonomic feedback from the metabolic component to the rest of PNEUMA: changes in insulin level lead to changes in sympathetic tone. System Requirements: PNEUMA requires Matlab R2007b or higher with the accompanying version of Simulink to be installed on your computer.

Proper citation: PNEUMA (RRID:SCR_001391) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry

https://cde.nlm.nih.gov/

A repository of Common Data Elements (CDE). The CDE is a standardized, precisely defined question, paired with a set of allowable responses, used systematically across different sites, studies, or clinical trials to ensure consistent data collection. Multiple CDEs (from one or more Collections) can be curated into Forms. Forms in the Repository might be original, or might recreate the format of real-world data collection instruments or case report forms. NIH has endorsed collections of CDEs that meet established criteria. NIH-endorsed CDEs are designated with a gold ribbon. Users can Browse NIH-Endorsed CDEs, Browse All CDEs, or Browse Forms.

Proper citation: NIH Common Data Element Repository (RRID:SCR_001390) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry